Ok yes he may have provided, but he caused a monster that needed to be taken down a long time ago. It sounds like Dad thought material things would fix her brokenness. So she's been rewarded for all her wrongs. I mean, knowing you can do no wrong in daddy's eyes is a powerful weapon with manipulation and control. I was shocked that she's only 29 and has caused all this havoc. Girl, all that's missing is for her head to spin, and for her to start climbing the wall to show she's possessed. At the same time, Dad is holding too much shame and offering protection over her , which leaves me to believe there's probably alot of trauma bonding, or there's something he isn't saying. Why keep bringing back the devil in your home? It's not just because your that loving; it can't be, because to put your whole family at risk, especially your son, means to put them last, and on the chopping block below her; giving her a peddle stool to whipe her feet on with lives hanging in the balance.

I don't know I really just don't know. Tasha is about to blow the top off all of it for sure though. But I could hear the girl twisting the story while on the phone at the end of the clip. She said , " Tasha talked to... and now SHE wants me to take a lie detector test " NAH BOO YOU SUGGESTED IT!! Tasha was just prepared and with the shit🤣

I think what Celest is saying is that the dad is defying what Celest knows of men, and how they love ( ie conditionally " doing your best to obey him" rather than unconditionally). Celest used the Bible to say that men ( Celest used God example) would hate all parts of the sin including the sinner, not just then sin itself ( her lies and false allegations) in other words dad would cut her off and because he isn't maybe there's some truth in the midst of her lies. I think that's what Celest is saying. I don't know if I agree on the love part. I actually know more men to be unconditionally loving than women, towards women. However, I do think there might be something else going on here. Dad is a little too protective over her. There's something not being said. I saw some shame in him. I also think that he might have some trauma bonding happening in this that's fueling the protection.

Actually everyone because she's doing interviews triggering people and these lies make it hard for true SA survivors.

This has to be mental health. She is a danger to every person who she gets close to.

Wait wait ✋️ he was always gay. This guy 🫣

Yo trying to figure out how to be gay🤣 this guy is wild

If you ever just come in after the live and read the comments first, it's hilarious

I'm disgusted by the conversation of the Auntie of Chris Stokes. She is trying to put the blame on everyone else " they need to speak up" , " where are those people to hold him accountable" THATS YOU TOO !! Where was yours? She raised them, but says nothing? She most likely left it up to the boys in a " if that's what they want to do, I can't stop them" kinda way while they were collecting them checks. She goes into saying , don't bring the molestation to your family, etc. How about don't molest at all. All she wants is a apology cause he did his family wrong. She's the wine This is deplorable. She's outted herself. Perception is everything even delusional one's.

Ok 🫣 so technically PP is as faulty as them PPP loans plus interest. They are doing way too much. Hopefully,PP confused the kids enough that they see the decision to have sex should be a well thought and educated one. PP can argue Virginity, like every named medical term IS made up, and the only thing real is what's happening inside your body, shout out to Seamoss and Olive Leaf ( I want my endorsememt money 💰😂😂), however PP bet not deny that something happens in your body after sexual intercourse. Losing Viginity / sex could be defined as anything that can contribute to STDs. Because you are losing the right to definitely not have a STD , that's facts. But that still isn't as accurate due to body factors the act of physical sex causes. Anyway, their language is dangerous rhetoric that could reverse court cases or standards of proof for SA victims that heavily relied on terms and definitions related to them, I hope they ready for lawsuits.